Numbers are wrong Mr Kurien!!!

November 6, 2007

Mr Kurien,

You defended Wipro saying your company did 5 million cab pickups every year and hence you should not be judged on one “Prathibha” episode. You forgot the name of your employee. You forgot the processes.. and you also gave wrong figures.

Believing 5 million is true.. it comes to 136000 rides every day and assuming that your company has 60000 employees, it means every employee is ferried every day in car..

False.. I do not think that figure is correct. Employees pay above market rates for Bus services and most of them use bus. ..Company hires cab only when employees overstay on company’s work. Typically a most busy center like bangalore had only around 400 drops every night as per most reliable data we have.

Many times employees have complained on shoddy quality of these cab drivers company hires. But Kurien wants more return on his stock option he plays the devil.

Jyothi stayed back for company’s work and hence missed/did not use company bus. So is it not company’s responsibility to provide a decent mode of transportation back to her residence? I am sure Kurien does not even know the law.. Indian Factory act 1948 stipulates that employee safe return to house within one hour after office/factory. “Kuriyaana” s can be booked for negligence.


Nasscom Reply is full of holes

May 31, 2007

I am commenting on the recent reply to American Senators by NASSCOM, nodal body of software companies in India . The press report on the reply is here.

Nasscom’s press release is hosted here

Predictably Nasscom replied in the nick of time. Senator wanted reply to questions by 29th of May. Nasscom not only replied when the clock struck 12 on 29th May .. but actually replied on 30th May in India..( there is time lag of 12 hours between India and US )

A copy of the letter sent by senators to one of the companies accused of fraud is here

Now back to what NASSCOM was asked and what NASSCOM supplied.

NASSCOM/ Companies were asked to provide Data on four counts namely NUMBER, WAGES, OUTSOURCING and LAYOFFs. There were 8 questions on NUMBER, 2 each on WAGES and OUTSOURCING, and 4 on LAYOFFs.

NASSCOM reply does not seem to have answered any of the questions raised by senators. I have already commented that it is a familiar tactic. If your doctor asks your temperature, you reply that your neighbor weighed 200 pounds.. What kind of logic is this.

Following are fatal flaws in NASSCOM reply

1) Pointing out that US universities applied for 20000 H1Bs last year.. US universities are cap exempt. So why does NASSCOM want to compare cap subject visas used by NASSCOM members with cap exempt visas. It gives a feeling that NASSCOM wants to downplay the visa figures used by its members. – First flaw in NASSCOM reply is that it is comparing apples and oranges

2) Claiming contribution done by H1B immigrants as its own. Remember HIBs are treated like dirt by these Indian Companies. Ron Hira has provided much more detailed analysis on labor arbitrage and short sightedness of these companies.

3) Downplaying Visa figures at one part of reply and Extrapolating Visa figure at another part of the reply. At one part the reply NASSCOM says that the cap for visas is 65000 and no more than 80% of is available for business because 20% of it is taken by US universities. Based on that figure, there should be only 52000 visas and hence fraud prevention fee collected should amount to 52000*500 = 26 million usds. ( fraud prevention fee is 500 USD per application)

However in later half of the reply NASSCOM boasts that about 300 mil USDs amounts to fraud prevention fees the businesses pay .. making it appear as though a pot of money is transferred to Uncle Sam because of these companies.

To arrive at the this new figure obviously NASSCOM has used a different number for H1Bs issued per year. Since H1B transfers are treated as separate but cap exempt applications, number of H1Bs and L1s approved last year if both cap subject and cap exempt visas are considered was actually around 600000. And figure of 300 mil was arrived probably by multiplying 600000 with 500 USD fraud fee per application.
Clearly this is akin to using different figure as and when it suited NASSCOM. .. or a fraud in reply..What more you can expect from a fraudster?

NASSCOM has done more damage to its own cause by doing these deliberate misrepresentations.

I will expose another fraud of mind boggling proportions perpetrated by NASSCOM later some times.. Meanwhile feel free to share this with others

Share This Article

From here you can use the Social Web links to save Nasscom Reply is full of holes to a social bookmarking site.